About the point that you have put across, I would say that you are trying to differentiate between two classes of people - “innovators”, and “revolutionist business men”. I understant that the latter class has been more successful in terms of recognition and earning, but if you look deeper, both are “Godly creatures”. And may be the first class is more successful in terms of self dignity, and self satisfaction. As they say, success is a relative term

And about the analysis paralysis thing, which we have talked a number of times, I think it requires more than intelligence to know exactly where you need to stop analyzing. That may also depend on your risk taking ability. If you are capable of taking higher risk, in terms of sustaining a failure or loss, your threshold to stop analyzing may come earlier……. Every idea might not be great, but every great, as well as well thought idea may also not succeed. I mean analyzing things itself requires a lot of intelligence, but to know where to stop analyzing, and start, require more, maybe a sixth sense. Finally, I don’t think there is any general rule for it. If there would have been any, everyone would have been a “Godly creature” as you say it. So, the bottom line is, do analyze, and follow your instincts on where to stop analyzing, and get going.